<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Federal Firearms Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://federalfirearmslaws.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com</link>
	<description>State &#38; Federal Firerams Laws - Not a Government Website.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Social Networking by admin</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/07/22/online-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/07/22/online-social-networking/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>GunRing.com has just started a Social network for gun and firearm enthusiasts. Talk about gun laws, gun safety, handgun permits, etc... check it out at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gunring.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.gunring.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GunRing.com has just started a Social network for gun and firearm enthusiasts. Talk about gun laws, gun safety, handgun permits, etc&#8230; check it out at <a href="http://www.gunring.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gunring.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nevada by hunter</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/federal-firearms-laws-resources/gun-laws/gun-laws-by-state-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/?page_id=677#comment-151</guid>
		<description>where is the best place in nevada to shoot bb guns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the best place in nevada to shoot bb guns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Right-to-Carry by Texas CHL License</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/federal-firearms-laws-resources/right-to-carry/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas CHL License</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/?page_id=209#comment-136</guid>
		<description>As of March 2008 there were 28 states in which Texas shares reciprocity agreements with.  These are:  

*Alabama
*Alaska
*Arkansas
*Arizona
*Colorado
*Delaware
*Florida
*Georgia
*Idaho
*Indiana
*Kansas
*Kentucky
*Louisiana
*Michigan
*Mississippi
*Missouri
*Montana
*New Mexico
*North Carolina
*North Dakota
*Oklahoma
*Pennsylvania
*South Carolina
*South Dakota
*Tennessee
*Utah
*Virginia
*Wyoming


In addition, there were 12 states which have a unilateral reciprocity agreement with Texas, whereby they may carry in the state of Texas but Texas CHL holders may NOT carry in the following 12 states:

*California
*Connecticut
*Hawaii
*Iowa
*Maryland
*Massachusetts
*Nebraska
*Nevada
*New Jersey
*New York
*Rhode Island
*Washington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of March 2008 there were 28 states in which Texas shares reciprocity agreements with.  These are:  </p>
<p>*Alabama<br />
*Alaska<br />
*Arkansas<br />
*Arizona<br />
*Colorado<br />
*Delaware<br />
*Florida<br />
*Georgia<br />
*Idaho<br />
*Indiana<br />
*Kansas<br />
*Kentucky<br />
*Louisiana<br />
*Michigan<br />
*Mississippi<br />
*Missouri<br />
*Montana<br />
*New Mexico<br />
*North Carolina<br />
*North Dakota<br />
*Oklahoma<br />
*Pennsylvania<br />
*South Carolina<br />
*South Dakota<br />
*Tennessee<br />
*Utah<br />
*Virginia<br />
*Wyoming</p>
<p>In addition, there were 12 states which have a unilateral reciprocity agreement with Texas, whereby they may carry in the state of Texas but Texas CHL holders may NOT carry in the following 12 states:</p>
<p>*California<br />
*Connecticut<br />
*Hawaii<br />
*Iowa<br />
*Maryland<br />
*Massachusetts<br />
*Nebraska<br />
*Nevada<br />
*New Jersey<br />
*New York<br />
*Rhode Island<br />
*Washington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buy Gun Safes by AndrewBoldman</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/firearm-accesories/buy-gun-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewBoldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/buy-gun-safes/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Great post! Just wanted to let you know you have a new subscriber- me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Just wanted to let you know you have a new subscriber- me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ohio: Number of right-to-carry permits rises sharply by Gun Debate</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/09/ohio-number-of-right-to-carry-permits-rises-sharply/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Gun Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/09/ohio-number-of-right-to-carry-permits-rises-sharply/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>People should have the right to protect themselves.  It is almost primal to be able to have a weapon even if we evolved past stick and clubs, a weapon is another from of that stick or club.

I do not think we should be shooting them in the street, but we should not have our hands tied behind our backs either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People should have the right to protect themselves.  It is almost primal to be able to have a weapon even if we evolved past stick and clubs, a weapon is another from of that stick or club.</p>
<p>I do not think we should be shooting them in the street, but we should not have our hands tied behind our backs either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Honeywell 2017 Fire and Water Chest, 0.19 Cubic Foot by Xiomara</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Xiomara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 09:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>
          5.0 out of 5 stars 
          Good Safe
          This is a good safe for our application.  Of course we have not tested its fire and waterproofing capabilities, but I&#039;ll take their word for it.
         
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0 out of 5 stars<br />
          Good Safe<br />
          This is a good safe for our application.  Of course we have not tested its fire and waterproofing capabilities, but I&#8217;ll take their word for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Honeywell 2017 Fire and Water Chest, 0.19 Cubic Foot by Keypad Door Locks</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Keypad Door Locks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>
          5.0 out of 5 stars 
          Good Value
          This document safe is a good value when purchased with free shipping. I&#039;m not concerned with the supposition that a fire may melt the box or fuze it together.
         
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0 out of 5 stars<br />
          Good Value<br />
          This document safe is a good value when purchased with free shipping. I&#8217;m not concerned with the supposition that a fire may melt the box or fuze it together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Honeywell 2017 Fire and Water Chest, 0.19 Cubic Foot by Prisca</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Prisca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 05:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>
          5.0 out of 5 stars 
          Sweet Safe
          This safe is better than I expected.  It&#039;s nice and solid, not too heavy, but not too light.  Locks and unlocks nicely.  A lot more space inside than expected.
         
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0 out of 5 stars<br />
          Sweet Safe<br />
          This safe is better than I expected.  It&#8217;s nice and solid, not too heavy, but not too light.  Locks and unlocks nicely.  A lot more space inside than expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Honeywell 2017 Fire and Water Chest, 0.19 Cubic Foot by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>
          4.0 out of 5 stars 
          Peace of mind
          I bought this item about a month ago.  It&#039;s difficult to review a product like this, because you&#039;re not sure how well it performs until you put it to the test.
         
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.0 out of 5 stars<br />
          Peace of mind<br />
          I bought this item about a month ago.  It&#8217;s difficult to review a product like this, because you&#8217;re not sure how well it performs until you put it to the test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Honeywell 2017 Fire and Water Chest, 0.19 Cubic Foot by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalfirearmslaws.com/2009/05/15/honeywell-2017-fire-and-water-chest-019-cubic-foot/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>
          5.0 out of 5 stars 
          Terrific
          Great box. Heavy, but worth it. It will keep all of my important papers safe and ready to do in an emergency.
        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0 out of 5 stars<br />
          Terrific<br />
          Great box. Heavy, but worth it. It will keep all of my important papers safe and ready to do in an emergency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
